Re: AppArmor support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> ----------------------------------------
> From: Levente Polyak <anthraxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon Sep 10 18:42:14 CEST 2018
> To: Geo Kozey <geokozey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  AppArmor support
> 
> I think you are totally missing the point, everyone can happily debug,
> bisect and get proper crash information. The problem is reporting
> upstream, which won't be accepted if you use anything but a vanilla
> kernel (which hardened isn't as it provides custom patches).
> 
> If you want to approach upstream then reproducing the same thing on the
> vanilla kernel is the only option you have, otherwise it will be rejected.
> 
> cheers,
> Levente
> 

Nope. Not everyone can happily debug and bisect if every bug causes panic
and forced reboot of their machine.

As a person who reported dozen of bugs (mostly upstream specific but some
of them can be found only with linux-hardened - all of them fixed) and who
tests every rc kernel with linux-hardened patch and several others patches on
top of it, I can tell you that none valid report will be rejected. Of course I don't
report issues with linux-hardened patch itself upstream.

I have to admit that if I haven't disabled myself CONFIG_PANIC_ON_OOPS I
would give up long time ago.

Yours sincerely

G. K.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux