On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 14:02:42 +0200, David Runge wrote: >Also, please don't double post your issues. Give people time to >actually respond. No need to post to arch-general, if you brought this >up before. This is not an instant messenger service. PS: Independent of what is required for a realtime (or the old audio) group and that there is no issue when using limits.d/file_with_a_higher_number.conf , I still question that '@users - memlock 1024' should be set by package. I doubt that a default 'memlock 1024' for the 'users' group is a good choice at all.
