On 07/22/2018 12:55 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 07/20/2018 04:23 AM, WorMzy Tykashi via arch-general wrote: >> On 20 July 2018 at 08:38, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 07/20/18 at 09:05am, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >>>> On 07/19/18 at 07:23pm, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: >>>>> On Wed 18.07.18 - 15:28, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: >>>>>> I would like to add this to [community], but I'm unsure what people >>>>>> think about this; specifically, whether this might come too close to >>>>>> "supporting the AUR via [community] packages". Note that this is >>> *not* >>>>>> an AUR helper and is strictly a tool for package *maintainers* to use >>>>>> during the process of uploading. >>>>> >>>>> Uploaders are fine by me and I think we had one in previously. >>>> >>>> From what I can recall, we had one in, some discussion and it was gone >>>> again. I'll try to find the post in the archives. >>>> >>> >>> Gotcha, it was cower. [1] >>> >>> [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010- >>> December/012763.html >>> >>> -- >>> Jelle van der Waa >>> >> >> (apologies for crosslist posting) >> >> For uploaders, there was 'burp' in [extra] which which was added without >> any serious opposition, and remained in the repos until shortly after AUR4 >> was launched (which made it redundant). See >> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-April/022787.html >> and https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/46210 >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> WorMzy > > So yeah, it seems like at least in the past there's been a distinction > made between uploaders (burp, aurpublish) and downloaders (cower). > > Anyway if no one has a serious objection by the end of the week I guess > I will add it. :) I've just added it to [community]. :) -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
