Re: Why do we have scapy and scapy3k and which do we keep?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:53:36PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>   Attempting a system update tonight, I was hit with:
> 
> # pacman -Syu
> ...
> looking for conflicting packages...
> error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
> error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
> :: scapy3k and scapy are in conflict
> 
>   They both seem to be similar, but which one do we keep? There was never a
> conflict before. I removed scapy3k, then curiously on one machine, it then
> proceeded to reinstall, along with scapy. I don't know how either were
> originally installed, I'd never heard of the package before the conflict
> popped up.
> 
>   Which should be keep? Or was this a packaging hiccup?

AFAIR, scapy3k was a python3 fork of scapy. Now that scapy supports
python3, it has been added to the conflicts array of scapy3k. You can
probably safely remove scapy3k as nothing depends on it in the Arch
repos; check your system.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux