Re: Curious about arch repository policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On 27/03/18 21:13, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:39:30PM +0100, morganamilo via arch-general wrote:

On 27/03/18 20:34, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:27:16PM +0530, Sudarshan Kakoty via arch-general wrote:
Hello...

I was reading "Arch Wiki" and felt curious about that difference
between extra and community repo.

Some packages, such as "meson" is in the "extra" repo, whereas "ninja"
is in "community" repo. The interesting fact is that -  is an implicit
dependency to "meson". So why that is (ninja) in the community repo?
A more important question is why meson and ninja are not in [core] and base
group given that they are build-dependencies of systemd?

Cheers,
L.
Probably because they're only make depends like you said. So in a user's
system make depends are not needed to install packages nor do they provide
any use.
But I thought [core] was supposed to be self-contained, or it only used to be?

Cheers,.
From a user's perspectvie they are self contained. Arch is a binary distro, the user does not need to mess with make depends.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux