Re: AL gnustep-core implementation misses gnustep-back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I'm not a trusted User, but I would offer maintaining the gnustep packages
in the AUR

Regards
Marc

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM, <arch-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:44:20 +0100
> From: LoneVVolf <lonewolf@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  AL gnustep-core implementation misses
>         gnustep-back
> Message-ID: <cd40bfd1-7775-0899-0039-808d9065ec2f@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 11-01-18 15:48, Bart?omiej Piotrowski via arch-general wrote:
> > On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> >> I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm
> >> definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to
> >> maintain GNUstep in official repos,?we should drop oolite.
> >
> > I'm going to drop oolite and remaining GNUstep packages on Monday,
> > unless someone adopts the latter.
> >
> > Bart?omiej
> >
> Not the answer I was hoping for, but if noone steps up that seems the
> best option.
>
> LW



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux