On 2018-01-09 13:04, LoneVVolf wrote: > In the recent repo clean up operation gnustep-back was dropped to AUR. > > I have maintained the oolite package when it was still in AUR and > remember plenty of problems with running oolite against faulty / > incomplete gnustep-core implementations . > > The gnustep upstream website [1] lists gnustep-back as a required > package for every gnustep install . > > The ANNOUNCE file in gnustep-back source code [2] states gnustep-gui & > gnustep-back are 2 components of the display system used by gnustep . > > I feel that removing gnustep-back from gnustep-core group goes against > arch linux policy of staying as close to upstream as possible. > > Lone_Wolf > > > > > > > > [1] > http://wwwmain.gnustep.org/resources/downloads.php?site=ftp%3A%2F%2Fftp.gnustep.org%2Fpub%2Fgnustep%2F#core > > > [2] ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/core/gnustep-back-0.25.1.tar.gz Yes, looks like it shouldn't have been removed. However all GNUstep packages are unmaintained, so I'd rather drop it all with oolite to AUR than keep in half-zombie state in repositories. Sven, any opinion on this? Bartłomiej
