Re: gscan2pdf - could it be included in the official arch repositories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gscan2pdf - could it be included in the official arch repositories?
From: Ben Oliver via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 06:35:42 +0100
Cc: Ben Oliver <benoliver999@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <25d2c7a6-aaa6-a60a-4862-5cb04bcee077@suddenlinkmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I can vouch for it too. I have to scan all the mail at work and before
we got a printer that scanned to FTP I went through loads and loads of
options trying to find some suitable scanning software.

Eventually I settled on gscan2pdf because it seemed to be one of the
few that could reliably make multi-page PDFs.

References:
- Re: gscan2pdf - could it be included in the official arch repositories?
  - From: Stephan Fuchs via arch-general
- Re: gscan2pdf - could it be included in the official arch repositories?
  - From: David C. Rankin

Prev by Date: Re: gscan2pdf - could it be included in the official arch repositories?
Next by Date: Weird artifacts after every pacman transaction
Previous by thread: Re: gscan2pdf - could it be included in the official arch repositories?
Next by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] removed mariadb 10.1.27 from [testing]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux