On 13.10.2017 09:01, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: > On 13/10/17, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: >>> ... for these long outdated packages? >>> >>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update&q=&maintainer=schiv&flagged=Flagged >>> >>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update&q=&maintainer=speps&flagged=Flagged > Hello, > > I can adopt few if they drop to AUR (of if I get sponsor to apply for a > TU). > > Regards, > Leonidas > Hello, I would do the same for a few of that listed packages under the same circumstances (a drop to AUR or finding a sponsor to apply for a TU). My current packages in AUR are listed here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&SeB=m&K=nullptr_t&outdated=&SB=n&SO=a&PP=50&do_Search=Go . If I would get a sponsor for applying as a TU, I would like to migrate plymouth (no AUR dependencies) to [community] or [extra], when current issues are patched. It is widely used and got a recent update from upstream (even if I think, the next update from upstream will take a while, most of my releases address community issues). Also, I'd like to have an audio mailing list (wether official or not) for discussion on that audio packages. Regards, Sebastian
