More from the manual: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct#Criminal_solicitation Cheers, Brad Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 25, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Kryptxy via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No logic here. Don't know what was I thinking last night that I posted about this project here (stupid me!). > I do regret posting it. Won't happen again. > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: (Off-topic) Command-line torrent download tool >> Local Time: July 25, 2017 8:07 PM >> UTC Time: July 25, 2017 2:37 PM >> From: eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> On 07/25/2017 05:29 AM, respiranto wrote: >>>> On 2017-07-25 03:05, Kryptxy via arch-general wrote: >>>> Hi there, I"m not sure if the PKGBUILD will be accepted in AUR. I >>>> had once posted a thread in open-source contributions in arch >>>> formus, but was taken down due to legal issues (end of the day, TPB >>>> is illegal :P). So I didn"t put effort in building PKGBUILD. That"s >>>> the ONLY reason I posted about it here. >>> >>> As far as I know, thepiratebay.org by itself is not illegal, only >>> much but not all of the _linked_ content. As an example, you can most >>> likely find a torrent-link for an Arch ISO. >> Probably worth noting that this defense breaks down when the project >> README specifically calls out high-profile illegal content as usage >> examples, though. :p >> Although the AUR *still* has that torrent client which is specifically >> designed to stream pirated movies via torrents, so I dunno. >> (I honestly thought that that was deleted, but I just checked and it"s >> still listed in the AUR!) >> -- >> Eli Schwartz
