Bradley thanks for all. I install the broadcom-wl-dkms and later, pacman -Syu and add dkms module in the kernel. Now the wifi is more efficient, speed and stability. Thanks for all. T 2017-07-07 23:29 GMT+02:00 Bradley Klee via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Maykel, > > Don't confuse me for an expert, but I have been dealing with Broadcom issue on a recycled dell laptop. > > According to the wiki, Broadcom devices have been historically difficult for Linux developers to work with. Replacement hardware could be a better option, but in the meantime wireless seems to work in my case using the "dkms" package. > > If Installing this you should read the following: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dynamic_Kernel_Module_Support > > Adding a dkms package will change your update procedure, sometimes making additional work for pacman. > > In case you didn't find the MacBook-specific wiki page, which also mentions Broadcom issues, try looking around here: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/MacBookPro11,x > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/MacBookPro7,1 > > Also, this topic is on numerous BBS threads, so you may want to try a google search, such as: "broadcom macbook 4331 site:bbs.archlinux.org" . > > Hope this helps, > > Brad > > > > > On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Maykel Franco via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, I have install archlinux in my MacBookPro with this wifi hardware: >> >> Broadcom Limited BCM4331 802.11a/b/g/n >> >> In the wiki arch: >> >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/broadcom_wireless >> >> BCM4331 noticed to have problems with b43-firmware-classic. Use >> b43-firmware for this card instead. >> >> I probed with b43-firmware-classic community and b43-firmware yaourt >> and both poor performance... 900k bandwith and microcuts. >> >> I will try broadcom-wl because I see in this link: >> >> https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/5qlyfm/cant_get_wifi_with_broadcom_bcm4331_chip/ >> >> Too I see broadcom-wl-dkms but I have the default kernel no dkms. >> >> Somebody with the same problem??
