About rebuild of pandoc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello all,

Some days ago the pandoc mantainer [1] do a rebuild of it [2] where
add a lot of haskell package dependencies. I think that the build
changes the binary from statically linked to dinamically linked, but
IMHO, I prefer the static one (55,08 MiB of package) over the dinamic
(more than 666 MB in libraries).

What do you think about this?

Other solution can be have other package "pandoc-static", that
maintains the previous method of package.

Greetings.

[1]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/pandoc/
[2]: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/pandoc&id=d340c92f8cf5686509551c08bcdaa0b5e66760b0

-- 
Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux