Hi, Guus. I've just run the memtest from archiso. Just passed, no error reported. So I'm afraid it has to be an fs bug or other hardware error... I'm looking forward to running a SMART test later. But the current Arch installation is on a Kingstom USB drive, is that okay with the SMART test? In fact, what confused me most now is why both pacman and fsck reported segmentation fault... It can't just be a coincidence, right? Oh, remembered one more thing. I tried to remove the gnome-extra group again this afternoon. The same error, the same output. More specifically, even exactly the same time the error happened (when attemptting to remove package telepathy-idle). Funny enough, Uhm? ;) Thx a lot! RW Guus Snijders <gsnijders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Op 14 mei 2017 04:29 schreef "Robert W0ng via arch-general" < >arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >Hello again, All. > >Update: > >I ran fsck in archiso this morning, and found sth interesting. > >To sum up, fsck.f2fs exit with signal 11, arguing segmentation fault. > > >AFAIK segfaults are memory errors (where $program tries to read or write >memory that isn't his). > >If there is a problem with the fs, fsck should complain and if possible fix >it, not just crash. > >Try memtest86 (give it a few hours) and see if something comes up. > > >Mvg, Guus Snijders
