Re: libx264 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
<arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/07/2017 02:28 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> And again, the cycle doesn't matter at all if your ffmpeg package is set up
>>> correctly.
>>
>> I don't understand how I can without additionally repacking libx264/x264,
>> but hopefully I will see what you're saying later today or tomorrow.
>
> What Doug is saying is, you should do what 99.9999999% of all other Arch
> Linux users creating custom packages to replace repo packages do, and
> make your forked ffmpeg package provide "ffmpeg", thereby ensuring that
> libx264/x264 depend on *your* package!

Is the idea that I create a machine local repo that has highest prio
and overrides arch extra/testing? Otherwise, I don't know how to unbreak
the cycle while only building a custom ffmpeg.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux