On 04/07/2017 04:21 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:07:12 +0200, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >> You don't appear to follow arch-dev-public [0] very closely, do you. > > This was mentioned a few days back on this mailing list, too. > What's your point? > >> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2017-March/028752.html > > To get access to the latest official PKGBUILDS ABS works and it could > be installed from Extra. There's no need to build something from AUR. The point is that ABS is unmaintained, might *not* work, is *known* to have not-worked quite recently, and will eventually be removed altogether (at which point asp will get an official release and be moved to extra). Whereas asp works quite well and gets you a lot more than ABS in the process. But mostly, because people seeking to download PKGBUILDs clearly have no problem using AUR packages in the general sense. So there is absolutely no need to suggest *inferior solutions* and justify them because "it's provided in an official repo"... -- Eli Schwartz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
