Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bartłomiej Piotrowski <bpiotrowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
From: Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:17:05 +0530
Cc: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar@xxxxxxxxx>, General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4d84eff9-39b1-75d3-9828-2221e13dc2b3@archlinux.org>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

Many Go tools have fairly generic names. Aren't you afraid of a (possibly future)
naming conflicts by placing them all in /usr/bin/?

--
Pierre Neidhardt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
  - From: Bartłomiej Piotrowski

References:
- What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
  - From: Iru Cai via arch-general
- Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
  - From: Bartłomiej Piotrowski
- Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
  - From: Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Prev by Date: Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
Next by Date: Re: Ardour 5.6 released - status on update
Previous by thread: Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
Next by thread: Re: What's the best way of packaging golang packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux