On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:23:42PM +0100, Christian Rebischke wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:26:55AM +0100, jjgaris via arch-general wrote: > > Building firefox takes hours making this not really an option for many users. > > Arch has deviated before from the upstream default, I see no reason why we should follow upstream by restricting the > > choice of the user. > > > Linux is _not_ about choice [1] > > cheers, > > chris > > > [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html So what? Is linux now about restricting user choice? While I generally agree with the referenced text, using it to justify restricting user chouce without reason is just nonsence. The way it is used, it is also one of the most stupid sentences ever created.
