Re: Why isn't SELinux officially supported?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Sorry, pressed 'Send' button accidentally. :(
Coming up:
...and detailed set up process on the Wiki, why can't those packages magically be maintained at the official repos? Since the upgrade experience of AUR packages are trully awkward... And I don't consider it safe to replace most of the critical packages with AUR packages...
Never intended to blame anyone, just wondering if  there is any special reason to do so... :Q

RW

On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Robert Wong via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Having been using Arch Linux with Gsecurity-patched Kernel (Though installed a LTS Kernel for emergency fallback.) for half a year, I got a question. I found all the SELinux-concerned packages at the AUR, as well as the detailed 
> 
> RW




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux