Re: Why was wpa_supplicant.conf renamed wpa_supplicant.conf.pacsav??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:25:00PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
>   I know this is small-potatoes stuff, but I just wonder if in these
> instances, it may not be better to either provide pre-update notice or do a
> post-install script rather than relying on a post update action by the user?
> At least in the cases where you know up-front that existing functionality will
> be disabled by the upgrade. (which was apparent from the comment)

Hmm, what about reading /var/log/pacman.log?

Cheers,
-- 
Leonid Isaev



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux