Re: Does LTS package really not fit to Rolling Release model and Arch Philosophy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 08:31:22 +0900, Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
> > The kernel is a different, as it can cause an unbootable situation.
>
> [...]
>
> On what reason or scenario, some LTS(maybe incompatible to the kernel)
> will break kernel or make the system unbootable?

Ideally never. The unbootable situation may be caused by the *kernel
itself*. I admit I'm a little amused about my forum post sparking a ML
discussion, but to quote another post on that same thread (by Jason):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Best,
Tinu a.k.a. ayekat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux