Re: Package versioning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



A 2016-09-01T23:57:07 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu:
> 
> When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
> numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
> 
> Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
> upstream developer) and an "xrev" that's bumped when minor changes are
> made to packages on Hackage (Haskell's CPAN/PyPi/RubyGems/...).
> 
> Then the packaging has a release.
> 
> So far I've been using versions of the form
> 
>    <upstream version>_<xrev>-<pkgrel>
> 
> But that isn't good enough, `pacman` has for instance reported that's
> 
> ~~~
> warning: haskell-vector-algorithms: local (0.7_1-2) is newer than haskell-core (0.7.0.1_0-1)
> warning: haskell-monadrandom: local (0.4_2-1) is newer than haskell-core (0.4.1_0-1)
> ~~~
> 
> which isn't correct since
> 
>    0.7 < 0.7.0.1
>    0.4 < 0.4.1
> 
> It seems `pacman` treats underbar like a period, which isn't at all what
> I was hoping for.
> 
> I'm hoping for some help to find something better. Any suggestions on
> how I should do this properly?
What do you think about making that xrev part of the pkgrel? Instead of
0.7_1-2 you'd have 0.7-1.2 < 0.7.0.1-0.1. And even if haskell-core
continues using that underscore, 0.7-1.2 < 0.7.0.1_0-1.

It's not very common to have a decimal Pkgrel, and I'm not sure if it is
good practice, but I've used it, in fact for Haskell packages in
particular.

Regards,
João Miguel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux