On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote:
Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.) was released, and lots of people came to our issue tracker for "broken" YouTube downloading because the Arch version was not updated yet.
In this case, wouldn't it suite better to be in the AUR always? It would be practically impossible that a package to be reviewed and signed so often. Also, my personal expectation on the official packages is to be more stable than that.
Cheers, Kwang
