On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:09:37 +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote: >I think you missed the part (on arch-dev-public) where the discussion >was about making qt5-x11extras a dep rather than an opt-dep, which is >OP concern. ;) Oops, I should have read more carefully. If I'm affected by a hard dependency, that IMO could be and should be an optional dependency, I build an empty dummy package to fulfil the dependency. Some dependencies are annoying. I didn't follow the discussion and in this case I don't care. Maybe there are reasons to make it a hard dependency. Regards, Ralf -- Death of ROXTerm https://sourceforge.net/p/roxterm/discussion/422638/thread/60da6975/
