I'll look at it soon. This happens if package depends change in core. greetings tpowa 2016-07-17 7:23 GMT+02:00 Alive 4ever <alive4ever@xxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 05:16:50AM +0000, Alive 4ever wrote: > > After 'having fun' with archboot, I finally got it working on both UEFI > > and BIOS. Just make sure that x86_64 and i686 archboot systemd container > > have proper package cache. This can be achieved by bind mounting host > > package cache '/var/cache/pacman/pkg' to chroot package cache. Also make > > sure that /tmp in which archboot-allinone.sh -g performed is large > > enough to hold image creation, at least 4GB. > > > > However, a very serious problem occured. The resulting Archboot dual iso > > doesn't properly contain all packages needed for installation. The most > > notable is 'libnftl'. 'systemd' (core) depends on iptables (core). > > 'iptables' can't be installed because 'libnftl' is missing (extra). This > > is serious problem that prevented archboot development for about two > > months. > > > > I know that 'archboot' only contains 'core' repository. As temporary > > solution, 'libnftl' should be added as 'SUPPORT_ADDITION' in > > archboot-svn.sh, so that users will be able to get a working > > installation by using only the 'archboot' image. > > > > I strongly suggest to move 'libnftl' to core repository to prevent this > > problem i.e. 'base' can't be installed without access to extra > repository. > > I mean 'libnftnl' library, which is also depends on 'libmnl'. > > These two packages (libnftnl and libmnl) should be moved to core > repository. > -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
