On 07/11/2016 05:01 PM, Maxwell Anselm via arch-general wrote: > I think the tool is great Florian, but I do not think that it warrants > official support. Consider examples like pacgem or pip2pkgbuild. These > tools help integrate Ruby/Python packages (which are usually managed via a > separate package manager) into pacman. They are great for users who want > pacman to be the single package manager for their entire system, but they > are still just AUR packages without official support. > I agree. This is a reasonable argument at least until Flatpak becomes much more popular. I will set it up elsewhere. Regards, Florian Pelz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
