Re: Announcing pacpak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/10/2016 04:45 PM, Levente Polyak wrote:
> We, as the Security Team, are strongly against any move to officially
> ship bundles that manage their dependency versions itself instead of
> regular software builds.
> […]

With pacpak, it will be the user’s responsibility to update the bundles
just like it is the user’s responsibility to update their Arch system. I
do *not* want Arch to ship official bundles. Users of Flatpak bundles
from elsewhere are of course on their own as well.

Yes, a kernel vulnerability may allow malware to escape the container. I
should not have said that Flatpaks can be run without any fear at all.
pacpak users should be made aware of this.

Regards,
Florian Pelz



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux