Re: [arch-dev-public] signoffs are dead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:28:10 -0700, Kyle Terrien via arch-general wrote:
>I have personally experienced several breakages in the past several
>months--more than usual.  A few were big enough that simply running
>'foo - --version' should have revealed a problem (i.e.  linking
>problems). A signoff process would have very likely caught these
>problems.

Could you provide some examples, by linking to the bug reports?

Excepted of issues that happen, if upstream decides to make a change of
course, as e.g. gtk or qt did, I couldn't notice more issues as usual.

Regards,
Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux