On 13 June 2016 at 01:31, Levente Polyak <anthraxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/13/2016 12:59 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > [...] prevent whip-sawing all arch users who following the > > recommendation in configuring their desktop from finding out their > config is > > broken on the first reboot after update following removal. > > > > <snip> > > I don't say there may be no problems, but bashing like that statement is > simply not fair and also not very helpful. > I read his message as "we shouldn't remove it just like that because _that_ would break peoples system/config", and not as "SLiM is broken". -- Maarten
