That was my first thought too... But as far as i can tell this release should not break anything, as changelog does not mention that ( https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/libarchive-announce/qdeGf_DRvN4) Well, i guess we only have to wait :) Federico Il 24 mag 2016 03:36, "Patrick Burroughs (Celti)" <celti@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > On Tue, 24 May 2016 00:42:32 +0200 > Federico Di Pierro <nierro92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I see that libarchive is still at 3.1.2 which is 3 years old, while > > latest version is now 3.2, released circa a month ago. > > I already saw it is tagged as out of date, but still it has not been > > updated. > > > > So...is there any issue blocking its update? Or is just packager away > > for some time? :) > > > > Thanks everyone! > > Federico > > AFAIK the maintainer is active (he's pushed packages as recently as the > 14th) — but pacman depends on libarchive for most of what it does, thus > I imagine everyone is being extra-careful about making sure it works > before a new version hits [core]. > > ~Celti >
