On 19-05-2016 13:33, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:13:51 +0100 > Mauro Santos <registo.mailling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>> Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build >>> modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub update at the end. >> >> Not sure triggering grub update automagically is a good idea, I maintain >> grub.cfg myself and I'm sure more people do the same. >> >> I'd guess everyone that maintains their own grub.cfg would really >> appreciate not having a bad surprise after a kernel update. >> > > I don't think he means as part of a package, but as something that the sysadmin > sets up. It's just an example of how ordering hooks can be helpful. > The way the sentence was worded I understood that in the future it could possibly be implemented as part of a package and raised the concern. When given as an example, it's a perfectly reasonable example of what a sysadmin might want to order properly :) Sorry for the noise. -- Mauro Santos
