They may "not" take action. Sorry for the typo. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Bruno Pagani <bruno.pagani@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Le 25/02/2016 16:57, Harrison Wells a écrit : >>> Still not clear what's the hold up. Will try to poke the maintainer on irc. >> >> Well, I didn’t wanted to say so at the time of the previous ask, but I >> think the maintainer IS the hold up. He has quite a lot of outdated >> packages: >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update&maintainer=eric >> >> And if you look at not outdated ones, most of them are not packaged by >> him. Indeed: >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update&packager=eric >> >> And here you see that over the 6 pkgbases he updated over the last three >> months, most of them were outdated for quite a long time before update, >> and 3 of them are already outdated. >> >> Maybe he is quite busy IRL currently or anything else, but then he >> should tell other devs so that someone could take care of those packages. ;) > > > I may not know the arch process, but why is it possible for a simple > version bump to be held up in a way that no other developer feels > like they may take action?
