El 14/02/2016 a las 10:45 p. m., Eric Engeström escribió: > Hi all, > > With the release of Vulkan imminent, I thought I'd prepare some packages > for Arch so that I can push them the minute it gets released :) > > I was thinking of splitting it into 4 packages: > - `vulkan-loader` with everything you need to run an app compiled against > Vulkan (/usr/lib/libvulkan.so*). This is what Vulkan-apps packages would > `depend` on. > - `vulkan-headers` with everything you need to build an app for Vulkan > (/usr/include/vulkan/* & /usr/lib/pkgconfig/vulkan.pc) (depends on > `-loader`) > - `vulkan-sdk` with all the debugging and validation stuff from LunarG > (/usr/bin/*, /usr/share/vulkan/*) (depends on `-headers` + `-loader`) > - `vulkan-manpages` (self-explanatory :P) > I've also made `-git` versions of all of those, except the `-sdk`: I can't > make it clean enough for a PKGBUILD without heavy patching of upstream's > build scripts (I'm hoping somebody fixes that soon enough, I don't have the > patience to do it myself :P). > > Does this sound reasonable? Supporting the minimal approach, have you examined boost packaging and naming? boost-libs contains the runtime libraries and the boost package what you would call the SDK, namely all the header, pkgconfig files and whatnot. -- Pedro A. López-Valencia http://about.me/palopezv/ Recession is when a neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. -Ronald Reagan
