Sorry if I was too harsh. But the methods are for fundamentally different purposes, apg's intends to remain compatible with systemd and is backed up by the AUR, while artoo's intends to replace systemd and has its own repositories elsewhere. AFAIK, artoo tried to convince apg to join forces, with no success. So 2 methods remain, each with their merits. However, as you say, it's true it wasn't clear in the original article why were there 2 methods. So I copied the article before the edit that removed artoo's method to a sandbox [1]. Then I'll add new info from the current article and finally present in the discussion page reasons for it to be added back as it will be in the sandbox. I think a sandbox is necessary because the original article with artoo's way is too much out of date and incomplete. Thank you for understanding, João Miguel [1] - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:JMCF125/OpenRC
