On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:51:50 -0600 Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:37:57 +0000 > mick <bareman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 18:30:15 -0700 > > Devon Smith <devo8604@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Is there anything lacking in systemd > > A clear, logical and consistant naming convention for the services, units, etc used by systemd, on a number of occasions I have spent an hour or more looking for the script that controls a particular service. Admittedly there seems to be less of them now than when systemd first invaded. cups is a pet hate of mine, wouldn't 'cupsd' be much more intuitive than 'org.cups.cupsd.service' or am I missing something? > > Yeah, pacman -Ql <package> | grep service > > Should take significantly less than an hour. > Now that I know about it, but I still think cupsd.service is more intuitive.
