Re: Firefox without signature checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:26:59 -0800
Kyle Terrien <kyleterrien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 01/02/2016 02:50 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:35:01 -0700
> > Leonid Isaev <leonid.isaev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 02:06:05PM -0800, Kyle Terrien wrote:  
> >>> Thank you!  I was tempted to reopen it, but it looks like the general
> >>> consensus is that an AUR package will be submitted.    
> >>
> >> You can only request to reopen...  
> > 
> > And that request would be denied unless you can bring new info to the table. So
> > far, I haven't seen any.  
> 
> The new info I have is that Mozilla is creating a walled garden.  There
> is no way to override it besides rebuilding Firefox.

That's not new info, that's the same argument that was already rejected.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux