On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Kyle Bassett <kylebassett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Aug 28, 2015 9:40 PM, "David Kaylor" <dpkaylor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Your problems are not specific to Arch. And not necessarily kernel > specific > > either. I'm glad you have solved your problem, but this wasn't the > > appropriate medium for it. > > > > David K, I suggest you review your post and see if it meets your own > requirements. No reason for a negative tone in this ML. > Am I somehow the only person who has ever told a poster their issue is not Arch relevant? I'm perfectly at ease with my "tone", as you refer to it. > I found this thread informative and helpful, David R. did his homework, and > uses Arch. I wish all the OP posts in my inbox were like his! David R., > glad you got it working. I'm glad the OP solved his issue. But I DON'T want my inbox full of questions about none-Arch relevant hardware quirks caused by sloppy manufacturers. At the very least, that stuff should go in the forums, where it is easy to sort out less relevant info.
