On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:30:05 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: >The Tor browser is quite insecure. It's nearly the same thing as >Firefox, so it falls near the bottom of the list when it comes to >browser security, i.e. below even Internet Explorer, which has a basic >sandbox (but not nearly on par with Chromium, especially on Linux) and >other JIT / allocator hardening features not present at all in Firefox. >What the Tor browser *does* have that's unique are tweaks to >significantly reduce the browser's unique fingerprint. > >https://blog.torproject.org/blog/isec-partners-conducts-tor-browser-hardening-study > >Tor would be a fork of Chromium if they were starting again today with >a large team. They don't have the resources to switch browsers. That >would only change if they can get Google to implement most of the >features they need. Vivaldi is based on Chromium. How does Vivaldi compare regarding security and privacy to IceCat, Pale Moon, Firefox, QupZilla, Opera? https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&K=vivaldi https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&K=vivaldi
