Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:01:38 +0200
In-reply-to: <20150610005501.4d5fe857@titan.byte.cx>

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:55:01 +0200, Jens Adam wrote:
>https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45282

When I searched earlier yesterday, the ticket wasn't opened.

Temporarily I added it to /etc/pacman.conf's IgnorePkg.

References:
- Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
  - From: Ralf Mardorf
- Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
  - From: Eli Schwartz
- Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
  - From: Ralf Mardorf
- Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
  - From: Jens Adam

Prev by Date: Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
Next by Date: Re: Debugging third-party library's segfault if its caused by system update?
Previous by thread: Re: Update issue, mate-settings-daemon-pulseaudio vs mate-settings-daemon
Next by thread: [mkinitcpio] about explicit module inclusion and purpose of udev hook
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux