I think you're right, pkgver should be updated anyway. Will stick to script then. Thanks everyone. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:02 AM Mark Lee <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday, May 01, 2015 01:27:58 PM Roman Rader wrote: > > I want to be in sync with official kernel config. > > Script is good idea but universal PKGBUILD based on core/linux will keep > me > > from updating the package manually every time kernel is updated. > > If you want to be in sync with the official arch kernel config, use git > rebase > in the PKGBUILD. > > I'm not sure if it's a wise idea to have PKGBUILD that's updating against > kernel releases but not updating its pkgver variable. It would mean > different > under the hood kernels, and the pkgver variable only reflects the static > changes you make on top of the kernel. In other words: > <mypackage>-1.0 /= <mypackage>-1.0 > since it's pulling in the kernel config branch. > > Regards, > Mark
