Re: Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 19/02/15 11:39 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 05:46 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 05:24 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
>>> On 19 February 2015 at 21:42, Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> You can't. If upstream provides a checksum, that gives you some verification,
>>>> but since github doesn't, there's no way to verify any of it.
>>>
>>> I don't know about github, but with bitbucket the checksums of these
>>> generated tarballs may change occasionally as I had this issue with
>>> luxrender. However, the sources were always the same, it was the
>>> metadata that changed.
>>>
>>
>> How important are checksums to PKGBUILDS then? Should sources with
>> varying checksums just have 'SKIP' in their integrity arrays?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark
>>
> 
> Furthermore, if the integrity check is different from upstream, is a
> packager obligated to host a copy of the source code for GPLed software?
> 
> Regards,
> Mark

No... the integrity check not matching is not because an out-of-tree
source tree was used. The checksums are certainly not there to improve
security, that's what GPG signatures are for.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux