On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:31:44 +0800 Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Marko Hauptvogel > <marko.hauptvogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is afaik no > > rule that prevents /extra packages from depending on /community, > > but the number should be kept small. > > As long as there is no rule (and don't get me wrong, I'm not in favour > of unnecessary bureaucracy) then there's no issue here. As packages > from [extra] depend on those in [community] I wonder whether it would > make sense for TUs and devs to coordinate rebuilds. I understand that > in the case of [core]/[extra] most devs updating a library just simply > trigger a pkgrel update for rebuilding since they have the proper > access rights, but obviously TUs don't for [core]/[extra]. Using > [community-testing] and [testing] for this purpose also comes down to > the same issue as I don't think TUs can move packages from [testing]. TUs can create rebuild todo lists the same as devs can. In this case, it was simply missed. It happens. Doug
