On 05/02/15 19:20, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > their actual permissions are those of the target. From what I understand (and tests I've done, and discussions on arch channels on IRC) their actual permissions are inherited from the directory they are in AND from the permissions of a target. Actions that act on the target always inherit target permissions (read, write and execute). Actions that act on the link, however, always inherit the directory permissions (delete and move). This can be tested by symlinking a file from another user's home directory (which will obviously have to be done as root. The file should by default have 600 permissions and should be owned by that user and his group). Renaming and deletion of the symlink will be allowed, but attempting to read, write or execute the file will depend on the group/others permissions of the file. The Wikipedia article [1] on symbolic links basically seems to say something along these lines, but not entirely correct. However, that entire sections lacks a lot of citations and should really have a few more than one [citation needed] tag. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link#Storage_of_symbolic_links -- Tomasz Kramkowski E-Mail: tk@xxxxxxxxxx PGP: 6FCE87503AAF42AB3BF4 94FE40B037BA0A5B8680
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
