Re: gnupg 2.1 not stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:11:00 -0500
"P. A. López-Valencia" <vorbote@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100
> > Gaetan Bisson <bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> [2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen:
> >>> 2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
> >>> 2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version
> >> Arch is not stable, it's modern.
> >>
> >> Besides, there are no open bugs regarding gnupg on our tracker.
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/42972
> >
> 
> As Gaetan Bisson told you in the tracker, file the bug against emacs, 
> where it obviously belongs.

I didn't file this bug, but did point out the upstream fix.  The bug
remains open in the tracker, and certainly involves this change to
gnupg.

~Jacob

Attachment: pgp32FICmb_LF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux