Re: gnupg 2.1 not stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:19:09 -0500
Ido Rosen <ido@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The correct response is indeed for users to panic and demand that Arch
> devs be more responsible about reading release notes before upgrading
> such important core components of the system.

LOL, are you serious? Do you know how long Arch operated without
package signing? You now expect users to panic?

You're taking this way, way to far.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux