Also, since it was mentioned regarding 2.1.x: ECC support is nice to have, but is a new feature that's not required for Arch db/package verification. That's why I suggested that we downgrade gnupg to 2.0.x and, for those users who are willing to take the risk with gnupg 2.1.x before it is marked stable, we can create a gnupg21 package (perhaps in AUR?), and then once gnupg 2.1 is marked as stable, we can rename gnupg21 to gnupg and add conflicts= and replaces= as appropriate... Gaetan, since you maintain gnupg, your word is law, so what are your thoughts?
