On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:32:20 -0500, Ido Rosen wrote:
> Agreed that everything in "core" should be maximally stable.
> Given that gpg is such a crucial core component of Arch's
> infrastructure and that gpg 2.1 is NOT stable. Could we switch back
> to gnupg 2.0.x (stable release)
"GnuPG modern (2.1) is the brand new [snip] It will eventually
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
replace the current stable (2.0)" - https://www.gnupg.org/download/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
IOW Ido isn't a troll.
[root@archlinux rocketmouse]# downgrade gnupg
Available packages:
1) gnupg-2.1.0-7-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (local)
2) gnupg-2.1.0-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
3) gnupg-2.1.0-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
4) gnupg-2.0.26-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
5) gnupg-2.0.25-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
6) gnupg-2.0.23-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
7) gnupg-2.0.22-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
select a package by number: 4
[snip]
add gnupg to IgnorePkg? [y/n] y
gnupg is security stuff, fellows, consider to care about it. I wasn't
aware about this issue, so again, thank you Ido for the heads up :)!
Regards,
Ralf
