Re: arch-general Digest, Vol 121, Issue 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:13:00 +0100
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Top posting for good reasons. Something like this [1] simply should be
> marked as junk. To reply to such a mail IMO is a crime.
> 
> [1] [snip]

To use plain text instead of mime for the digest, so that it becomes
impossible to keep the thread is ok. It's also ok, if somebody forgot
to edit the subject even while quoting.

> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of arch-general digest..."

We are humans, that's all ok, _but_ really, why is there the need to
quote a compete digest?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux