Re: stunnel 5.06-1 vs systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10/30/2014 02:08 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:17:19 -0700
"Patrick Burroughs (Celti)" <celticmadman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...

Shouldn't that rather be handled by a tmpfiles.d snippet, and not in
the service file?
..
Yes, tmpfiles is the correct way of handling this and there is already
a conf file installed by stunnel that should be creating this dir. If
it's not, the OP needs to look into why.


1) This has been working fine till yesterday after systemd update to 217-1. I use it every day.

  2) There is a tmpfiles snippet:

# cat /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/stunnel.conf
d /var/run/stunnel 0770 stunnel stunnel -

 3) So the question now is why was /run/stunnel not created at boot?

 journal only has this reference to tmpfiles:

...systemd[1]: Breaking ordering cycle by deleting job systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service/start ..setup.service/start deleted to break ordering cycle starting with basic.target/start


  What else can I look for that would help track down the issue?

  Thanks.
gene


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux