I don't think this is a good reason to remove Qupzilla from arch repositories. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Jesus Balbastro <jesusbalbastro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Excuse me. I have no say or authority on this, but that sounds like an > opinion. Maybe elaborate? I don't use this browser myself but if it has > deviated so much from what you like im certain it has a good fork > somewhere. > > On Thursday, October 9, 2014, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/qupzilla/ > > > > IMO Qupzilla should be removed from the official Arch repositories. > > Qupzilla was the browser I used. The latest update comes with the > > information that the old data doesn't fit to Qupzilla's new design, so > > users lose the complete history. Such a fundamental attitude from > > upstream IMO is absolutely intolerably. > > >
