On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:55:26PM +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Neven Sajko <nsajko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But that task is not only about the filesystem location of the Pacman DB. > > It could be useful to open a separate bugreport just for that one issue. > > For what reason should the pacman DB be moved if not to enable new features > like the factory reset or image based installation? > > I can file separate bugs for all the items listed in > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41863 , > but I personally do not think it makes a lot of sense. Yeah, that's what the 1st response in the bug report basically said: pacman DB location is a cosmetic detail. Also, note that systemd features like factory reset and/or atomic updates make no sense in the context of a rolling-release distro like Arch (or any distribution for that matter), so I doubt that they can be a sufficient motivation for this DB move... > > Best Regards, > Tobias Cheers, -- Leonid Isaev GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6 20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4 C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
pgp7V24RjnXyb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
